The concept of “emergency advocacy” in Nigerian politics is a fascinating yet troubling phenomenon. It refers to the tendency of politicians to suddenly become vocal about the nation’s problems only when it suits their interests. This is perfectly illustrated by the recent actions of former Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, and former Governor Nasir El-Rufai.
Amaechi’s criticism of the current government raises eyebrows, considering he was part of the previous administration and never spoke out against its shortcomings. Similarly, El-Rufai’s sudden outspokenness may be driven by his rejection as a ministerial nominee due to security concerns ¹.
This “emergency advocacy” syndrome is not limited to these individuals. Many Nigerian politicians have been guilty of exploiting public sentiment for political gain, rather than genuinely working towards national development. They prioritize their own interests over the nation’s needs, often using popular themes to manipulate public opinion.
The consequences of this syndrome are far-reaching. It erodes trust in the political system, perpetuates corruption, and hinders meaningful progress. As Osaremen Iluobe notes, Nigerian politics operates within a “civic public realm” characterized by prebendalism, where politicians prioritize personal gain over public interest ¹.
To break this cycle, Nigerians must demand more from their leaders. We need politicians who prioritize national development over personal interests, and who are willing to work towards meaningful change, rather than just paying lip service to it.
Ubong Usoro for Nigeria Magazine